Page 57 - 5th APA Conference Program Book Final
P. 57

Categories


               6. Family Formation and Dissolution, Family and Kinship

               Abstract

               This study examines the relationship between husband’s or wife’s perceived utility of having a child and family
               formation in contemporary Japan. Although vast literature on subject of family formation are based on a perspective
               in which a couple has a child when their utility of having a child is larger than one of not having a child, few studies
               empirically analyzed the relationship between their utility and birth. I constructed a perceived utility score using a
               longitudinal data from the Generations and Gender Survey in Japan (JGGS-1) in 2004 and JGGS-2 which followed
               up JGGS-1 in 2007. Controlling duration of marriage and family size, a wife’s perceived utility score has a statistically
               significant relationship with probability of birth sequentially from 2004 and 2007 and a husband’s perceived utility
               score  doesn’t  have  a  statistically  significant  relationship  with  it.  Large  gender  differences  in  housework  and
               childcare persist in Japan. Most husbands don’t spend time for childcare and husbands’ perceived utility don’t have
               an impact on their decision whether having a child or not.



               48 The long echo of war. Early-life exposure to armed conflict and female
               experiences of intimate partner violence


               Orsola Torrisi

               The London School of Economics, London, United Kingdom

               Categories


               6. Family Formation and Dissolution, Family and Kinship

               Abstract


               Does  violence  beget  violence? While  there  are  reasons  to  expect  a  link  between  armed  conflict  and  future
               victimisation in intimate relationships, empirical evidence on the association is scant and rarely considers the age
               at exposure to war. This paper examines the legacy of experiencing armed violence in key developmental ages on
               women’s later risk of domestic abuse in four ex-Soviet conflict-torn countries. I use cross-national data on intimate
               partner violence (IPV) from the Demographic and Health Survey and geo-referenced information from the Uppsala
               Conflict Data Program. Exploiting cohort and spatial variation in conflict exposure, I find a positive relationship
               between armed violence and IPV, particularly physical and sexual abuse, for women exposed to conflict in early
               childhood (ages 0-10). Results hold for both lifetime and past-year domestic abuse and are not driven by migration.
               Among testable channels, I find no association between early-age conflict exposure and greater tolerance of IPV in
               women.  Conversely,  for  men,  war  in  late  teen  ages  (16-19)  correlates  positively  with  attitudes  condoning
               violence against  female  partners.  Normalisation  of  the  use  of  violence  in  future  perpetrators  rather  than
               desensitisation to abuse in victims appears one plausible mechanism explaining the long-term impact of armed
               conflict on intimate relationship quality.








                                                                                                  57 | P a g e
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62